The Jon Stewart show on April 17th identified the self-contradicting feature of CNN's coverage on the Boston Massacre. Here is the gist of it,
At 1:46, John King, the reporter for CNN claimed that a "dark skin male identified and captured".
At 2:44, King said no arrest has been made, anyone who said arrest in ahead of themselves.
But, wait a minute, isn't that you?
So, CNN spent the entire afternoon going back and forth, spent hours of programming fighting themselves and the suspect went from "definitely caught, headed to federal court" to "never existed". I don't want to believe it but Jon Stewart has the clip of real CNN footages. If we are talking about soap opera, we expect senseless repetition because that's the nature of it. But CNN? the Cable News Network? the coverage of Boston Marathon Massacre? One really doesn't expect the content of such quality. The self-branded fake news Jon Stewart has a much more acute sense of assessing information than the CNN reporter who rushed to a conclusion and then made a fool out of himself.
I was very disheartened and confused: what happen to U.S. media and why is CNN spent hours and hours of news coverage telling literally nothing? No wonder American people are disappointed in the mainstream media and Independent media is on the inevitable rise, because mainstream media are not doing their jobs properly. On the same day when I looked at Democracy Now's coverage, it is much more accurate and concise.
CNN is truly disappointing yet I still see hope: people like with great eyes like Jon Stewart and people who really care about delivering accurate news and inform the public like Amy Goodman. U.S. information/communication industry will retain its prime position because of the hard work of these people.
Friday, April 19, 2013
Yahoo! to cease email services in China
So very recently Yahoo! announced that it will shut down its mail service in China schedules to start on April 18th and be completed by Aug 19th. There are speculations that Yahoo!'s market value in China has been shrinking significantly because they have leaked user information to the Chinese government. Alibaba, an e-commerce company that runs Yahoo China decided to terminate Yahoo mail service but keep the news and search engine part of the web site.
It is believed that Yahoo China's shrinking popularity caused its unprofitability, in the capitalistic society of China, Alibaba decides to place profitability above users' interests. Yahoo China has urged its users to export their important emails to AliCloud, which is a less prominent mail service ran by Alibaba. This change will cause Yahoo mail users tremendous inconvenience: they will be forced to switch to a less pronounced mail service provider and they have to use a new email account. My mum has been using a Yahoo account for years and that is also the email address she printed on her business cards. Now she will have to make a whole new bunch of business cards. My mum is just one of the hundreds or thousands of users being affected, the exact number has yet to be confirmed.
Very well Yahoo!, first you leaked all the confidential informations to Chinese government and saying that "The company said it was legally obliged to divulge information about its users to the Chinese government but that it was unaware it would be used to convict dissidents. " I am just wondering what does Yahoo! mean here by "legally obliged", according to whose law and what else does Yahoo! think the Chinese government is going to use these information for? and now there is this, Yahoo! is generously dismantling its image in China and wasting away its capitals. I hope other companies that have a vast interest in China will not repeat the same mistake.
It is believed that Yahoo China's shrinking popularity caused its unprofitability, in the capitalistic society of China, Alibaba decides to place profitability above users' interests. Yahoo China has urged its users to export their important emails to AliCloud, which is a less prominent mail service ran by Alibaba. This change will cause Yahoo mail users tremendous inconvenience: they will be forced to switch to a less pronounced mail service provider and they have to use a new email account. My mum has been using a Yahoo account for years and that is also the email address she printed on her business cards. Now she will have to make a whole new bunch of business cards. My mum is just one of the hundreds or thousands of users being affected, the exact number has yet to be confirmed.
Very well Yahoo!, first you leaked all the confidential informations to Chinese government and saying that "The company said it was legally obliged to divulge information about its users to the Chinese government but that it was unaware it would be used to convict dissidents. " I am just wondering what does Yahoo! mean here by "legally obliged", according to whose law and what else does Yahoo! think the Chinese government is going to use these information for? and now there is this, Yahoo! is generously dismantling its image in China and wasting away its capitals. I hope other companies that have a vast interest in China will not repeat the same mistake.
state media propaganda, the case of PBS and Xinwen Lianbo
It’s disheartening to see PBS news hour is continuing its
lack of balance, diversity and public opinions because they are forced to slip
into total commercialization. What really stood out to me was
“scanning the PBS schedule one finds weasels eating snakes,
British people talking, Beltyway pundits barking, and a surfeit of how to shows”
instead of
“teach Americans how to dissect propaganda, evaluate
policies, share their opinions with each other, and defend the public interest.”
That article was written in 2006, it’s hard to image what
PBS has become of right now, but since I don’t live in America, there is no way
for me to speak about the changes in PBS from a personal point of view. I can
however talk about my own personal experience with the public broadcasting that’s
taking place in China. It’s the same kind of propaganda that can be seen on a prime time 30-minutes news program that runs daily on CCTV, Xinwen Lianbo: nothing ever goes
wrong in China, but there is always warfare and political turbulence in foreign countries, especially America. There is an interesting saying from Chinese netizen that "I wish I could live in Xinwen Lianbo".
So what exactly is the difference between U.S media and Chinese media? Not that obvious to me. This tool of propaganda is powerful, people who are uninformed or who do not have a habit of digging through news will believe whatever that's been fed to them.
We need that trust funds.
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Does my business plan work?
After reading the checklist of a journalism start-up by Adam Westbrook, I decided to put my business model into these questions and see if they work, and what I get based on my assessment doesn't seem to be working that well. Here we go and we'll see why.
1, Is it a new idea?
I wouldn't say it is completely new, drudge report is about doing the similar thing. Except my idea will bring in different articles by different major newspaper across the globe on one single issue. I would say it should qualifies as a new idea.
2, Does it have a defined target audience?
Yes. People who does not have too much faith in what the U.S. mainstream media and wants to hear different perspectives. But I think this might just be the problem, those people probably know where to find the news source they want and I wonder if they will need my help.
3, Does it provide niche (hyperlocal) content?
Probably not. Again my idea will not be limited to audiences in certain areas but rather an interest group. So I would say my idea does provide a specific content.
4, Does it satisfy a desire that is not being fulfilled by someone else?
Again if people want unique contents with different perspectives, their interests would be the main motivator for them to find those different perspectives. But if I do a good job with what news to select and how different newspaper report these news from different angles, I would have some followers who are tired of digging through different websites by themselves.
5, or does it do something better (faster, cheaper, more effectively) than someone else?
no competitor has been found yet. So... I would assume mine is going to be a trendsetter.
6, Does it actually have income potential, or it will rely on funding?
Asking for donations from my readers wouldn't be impossible, but the operational cost for this website wouldn't be too daunting, from my opinion. Starting this project could be a one person operation, because there are only number of certain news of the magnitude that's I want to find different articles on. The domain name for a website with low traffic wouldn't cost too much. (as Jacobson has mentioned) and that would probably be the only area that requires funding, assuming I still have a day time job. As traffic goes up and my readership has accumulated, I can start accepting advertisement offers.
7, Does it use the power of crowd-sourcing/community?
ermmmm... never thought about this. I guess I can have my readers gather different versions of the same stories and post them on my website, and also comment about how they feel after reading all these different versions of news story.
8, Would it be fulfilling for journalists to work for?
ermmmm... No...
9, Does it publish/exist on more than one platform?
I think it has to exist on the internet, because all these different reports will come from internet sources.
10, If it has content, is it sharable?
It is definitely sharable as I would allow my readers to form opinions of their own, and they can share these opinions as freely as they want.
11, Does it require a lot of money to run?
As I've mentioned earlier, it doesn't according to that model. But if copyright and hype-linking is an issue, then I probably need to abort this plan because I wouldn't be able to afford that kind of money.
12, Does it have boot-strapping potential?
This is a bootstrapping business from top to bottom.
13, Does it scale?
It definitely has the potential of getting big if my sourcing quality is good and people have genuine interests in diversity in news.
14, Does it fulfill a public service?
Yes. My mission is to inspire people to get information from as many different outlets as possible therefore eliminate the possibility of getting biased version of stories.
15, Is it a legally sound idea? What about copyright?
This is what I'll have to figure out. If this hype-linking will constitute violations then I better adopt a different ideas before all those multimillion news company decide to sue my butt off.
16, Would it appeal to venture capitalists, angel investors?
I wouldn't say so because my idea does not protect or even maintain corporal interests, is breaking up the chain of monopoly. This wouldn't be very appealing.
17, and...Does it have a cool name?
worldaccordingtousandthem.com? not cool enough, but I am working on something better.
1, Is it a new idea?
I wouldn't say it is completely new, drudge report is about doing the similar thing. Except my idea will bring in different articles by different major newspaper across the globe on one single issue. I would say it should qualifies as a new idea.
2, Does it have a defined target audience?
Yes. People who does not have too much faith in what the U.S. mainstream media and wants to hear different perspectives. But I think this might just be the problem, those people probably know where to find the news source they want and I wonder if they will need my help.
3, Does it provide niche (hyperlocal) content?
Probably not. Again my idea will not be limited to audiences in certain areas but rather an interest group. So I would say my idea does provide a specific content.
4, Does it satisfy a desire that is not being fulfilled by someone else?
Again if people want unique contents with different perspectives, their interests would be the main motivator for them to find those different perspectives. But if I do a good job with what news to select and how different newspaper report these news from different angles, I would have some followers who are tired of digging through different websites by themselves.
5, or does it do something better (faster, cheaper, more effectively) than someone else?
no competitor has been found yet. So... I would assume mine is going to be a trendsetter.
6, Does it actually have income potential, or it will rely on funding?
Asking for donations from my readers wouldn't be impossible, but the operational cost for this website wouldn't be too daunting, from my opinion. Starting this project could be a one person operation, because there are only number of certain news of the magnitude that's I want to find different articles on. The domain name for a website with low traffic wouldn't cost too much. (as Jacobson has mentioned) and that would probably be the only area that requires funding, assuming I still have a day time job. As traffic goes up and my readership has accumulated, I can start accepting advertisement offers.
7, Does it use the power of crowd-sourcing/community?
ermmmm... never thought about this. I guess I can have my readers gather different versions of the same stories and post them on my website, and also comment about how they feel after reading all these different versions of news story.
8, Would it be fulfilling for journalists to work for?
ermmmm... No...
9, Does it publish/exist on more than one platform?
I think it has to exist on the internet, because all these different reports will come from internet sources.
10, If it has content, is it sharable?
It is definitely sharable as I would allow my readers to form opinions of their own, and they can share these opinions as freely as they want.
11, Does it require a lot of money to run?
As I've mentioned earlier, it doesn't according to that model. But if copyright and hype-linking is an issue, then I probably need to abort this plan because I wouldn't be able to afford that kind of money.
12, Does it have boot-strapping potential?
This is a bootstrapping business from top to bottom.
13, Does it scale?
It definitely has the potential of getting big if my sourcing quality is good and people have genuine interests in diversity in news.
14, Does it fulfill a public service?
Yes. My mission is to inspire people to get information from as many different outlets as possible therefore eliminate the possibility of getting biased version of stories.
15, Is it a legally sound idea? What about copyright?
This is what I'll have to figure out. If this hype-linking will constitute violations then I better adopt a different ideas before all those multimillion news company decide to sue my butt off.
16, Would it appeal to venture capitalists, angel investors?
I wouldn't say so because my idea does not protect or even maintain corporal interests, is breaking up the chain of monopoly. This wouldn't be very appealing.
17, and...Does it have a cool name?
worldaccordingtousandthem.com? not cool enough, but I am working on something better.
Tuesday, April 2, 2013
Does state-controlled source of information create stability?
I came across a very insightful post while researching for independent media in China. It asks a really good question: does controlled source of information create stability (as the government put it) or instability?
This post argues when people don't believe in the information that comes from the government, any rumors could have easily gone viral because people have more trust for these rumors than the mainstream media. Most of the times these rumors are not true and it becomes very difficult for the government to do damage control.
I have never really thought about the importance of independent media in this context, which is their roles in maintaining social order and stability. I doubt same thing is happening in the U.S, but when people's faith in mainstream media has really dropped to a certain point, society is definitely more susceptible to social unrest and turmoil.
Independent media does more than reporting the news.
This post argues when people don't believe in the information that comes from the government, any rumors could have easily gone viral because people have more trust for these rumors than the mainstream media. Most of the times these rumors are not true and it becomes very difficult for the government to do damage control.
I have never really thought about the importance of independent media in this context, which is their roles in maintaining social order and stability. I doubt same thing is happening in the U.S, but when people's faith in mainstream media has really dropped to a certain point, society is definitely more susceptible to social unrest and turmoil.
Independent media does more than reporting the news.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)